三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

  Home>News Center>World
         
 

U.S. Justice Dept. rewrites prison advice
(Agencies)
Updated: 2004-06-24 08:58

The US Justice Department is rewriting its legal advice on how far U.S. interrogators can go to pry information from detainees, working under much different circumstances from the writers of earlier memos that appeared to justify torture.

The first memos were written not long after the Sept. 11 attacks, while the new advice is being crafted against the backdrop of prisoner abuse in Iraq.

Justice Department lawyers will spend several weeks reviewing and revising several key 2002 documents, especially a 50-page memo to the White House on Aug. 1, 2002, that critics have characterized as setting the legal tone for the mistreatment of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison.

"The reason the original memo was so damaging was that it was consistent with a pattern of conduct from Afghanistan to Guantanamo Bay to Iraq," Jonathan Turley, a constitutional law professor at George Washington University, said Wednesday.

A day after releasing hundreds of pages of legal memos on the terror war, Bush administration officials reiterated that even though President Bush signed a declaration in 2002 saying he had the authority to ignore international rules for treatment of captives, no orders were given to torture or mistreat prisoners.

The unusual decision to release the memos and disclose that some were being revised came amid intense political pressure from Democrats and other critics stemming from the Iraq and Afghan abuses. Yet no Bush administration officials flatly said the memos were wrong.

Current and former Justice Department officials rejected criticism that the Aug. 1 memo, signed by then-Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee, laid a legal foundation for torture. They said that the memo's sections along such lines never became administration policy and that no detainees had been mistreated at Guantanamo Bay.

They also said that no Justice Department memo on interrogations addressed the war in Iraq, which the administration determined was governed by the Geneva Conventions and that treaty's rules for treatment of prisoners of war.

One of the most controversial sections of the Bybee memo that appears targeted for change or removal is entitled "The President's Commander-in-Chief Power." Over the next nine pages, Bybee lays out arguments that a key U.S. anti-torture law would be unconstitutional "if it impermissibly encroached on the president's constitutional power to conduct a military campaign."

"One of the core functions of the commander in chief is that of capturing, detaining, and interrogating members of the enemy," the Bybee memo said.

Critics say that reasoning goes too far. Some say it would give the president absolute authority in the waging of war.

"The administration has shown a stunning disregard for the law, resorting time and again to saying 'we are at war,'" said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass. "We are not under martial law in this country. The laws and the Constitution are not suspended because we are at war."

Democrats on Capitol Hill are pushing to secure release of more Bush administration documents, with some in the House calling for a special committee to investigate abuses at Abu Ghraib.

"We can't get to the bottom of this unless there is a clear picture of what happened at the top," said Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, senior Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Although the administration released memos on interrogation techniques approved for military personnel, the advice given to the CIA and other intelligence agencies remains classified and will not be released, officials say. One CIA contractor has been indicted on charges of severely beating an Afghan prisoner who later died, and others are under investigation.

It is clear that, in a presidential election year, photos of U.S. personnel abusing prisoners in Iraq made the conclusions of the post-Sept. 11 memos untenable for the Bush administration, legal experts say.

"The highly charged political context of prisoner mistreatment highlights the sensitive nature of earlier (Justice Department) opinions and casts their manipulation of the law in a critical light," said Thomas Sargentich, an American University law professor and former attorney with the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel.

John Yoo, a University of California, Berkeley law professor and former Justice Department official, said government lawyers were confronted with a unique foe after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, one to whom conventional rules of war meant nothing.

"Sept. 11 started a completely new kind of conflict, with a new non-state enemy that fights in unconventional ways that violate the very core notions of the laws of war," Yoo said. "In this new conflict, I think it's good practice for the government to ask questions about the legal lines established in statute by Congress."

Yoo, who worked with Bybee in the Bush administration's Office of Legal Counsel, declined to comment on the substance of the memos.

Attorney General John Ashcroft also refused to comment Wednesday, saying that senior agency officials insisting on anonymity had given an "unprecedented" briefing about the documents a day earlier.

"I don't expect to make further comments about that," Ashcroft said.



 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

Price hikes not to stop until October

 

   
 

DPRK: Concrete plans can help nuclear talks

 

   
 

China set to clarify bankruptcy protection

 

   
 

Audit: US$170 million discovered misused

 

   
 

Boat sinks killing one, 43 lost

 

   
 

Locust plague devastates crops

 

   
  US drops UN bid for war crime shield
   
  Suspected mastermind vows to kill Iraq PM
   
  Iran postpones talks on British sailors
   
  Militant vows to assassinate Iraq premier
   
  Iraq militants behead S. Korean hostage
   
  US approved use of dogs against prisoners
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  News Talk  
  Does the approval of UN resolution on Iraq end daily bloodshed there?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品国产亚洲精品看不卡 | 黄色片com| 日本特交大片免费观看 | 国产一区系列在线观看 | 九九国产精品九九 | 国产成人夜间影院在线观看 | 在线看免费涩涩视频网 | 久久99国产精品久久欧美 | 成人性色生活片免费网 | 中国欧美一级毛片免费 | 免费在线观看的黄色网址 | 色偷偷女男人的天堂亚洲网 | 国产欧美日韩在线不卡第一页 | 香蕉人精品视频多人免费永久视频 | 日韩精品亚洲一级在线观看 | 国产 欧美 日产久久 | 91短视频在线看 | 在线观看黄 | 2019国内精品久久久久久 | 9久9久女女热精品视频免费观看 | 亚洲最大免费视频网 | 99视频都是精品热在线播放 | 国产精品一区在线观看你懂的 | 国产一级αv片免费观看 | 91先生在线 | 日韩h片 | 亚洲综合网国产福利精品一区 | 91久久国产情侣真实对白 | 黄色小视频在线播放 | 六月丁香婷婷天天在线 | 国产vvv在线观看 | 91短视频版在线观看免费 | 精品欧美一区二区三区免费观看 | 日韩欧美一区二区不卡看片 | 91破解版在线 | 亚洲 | 青青青视频蜜桃一区二区 | 国产高清免费在线 | 美女在线看永久免费网址 | 亚洲精品综合一区在线 | 精品国产免费一区二区三区五区 | 国产永久免费视频m3u8 |