三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

  Home>News Center>World
         
 

U.S. money helped opposition in Ukraine
(Agencies)
Updated: 2004-12-11 09:39

The Bush administration has spent more than $65 million in the past two years to aid political organizations in Ukraine, paying to bring opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko to meet U.S. leaders and helping to underwrite exit polls indicating he won last month's disputed runoff election.


Ukrainian opposition presidential candidate Viktor Yushchenko answers journalists questions as he arrives at Vienna's Rudolfinerhaus hospital for medical treatment December 10, 2004. [Reuters]

U.S. officials say the activities don't amount to interference in Ukraine's election, as Russian President Vladimir Putin alleges, but are part of the $1 billion the State Department spends each year trying to build democracy worldwide.

No U.S. money was sent directly to Ukrainian political parties, the officials say. In most cases, it was funneled through organizations like the Carnegie Foundation or through groups aligned with Republicans and Democrats that organized election training, with human rights forums or with independent news outlets.

But officials acknowledge some of the money helped train groups and individuals opposed to the Russian-backed government candidate — people who now call themselves part of the Orange revolution.

For example, one group that got grants through U.S.-funded foundations is the Center for Political and Legal Reforms, whose Web site has a link to Yushchenko's home page under the heading "partners." Another project funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development brought a Center for Political and Legal Reforms official to Washington last year for a three-week training session on political advocacy.

"There's this myth that the Americans go into a country and, presto, you get a revolution," said Lorne Craner, a former State Department official who heads the International Republican Institute, which received $25.9 million last year to encourage democracy in Ukraine and more than 50 other countries.

"It's not the case that Americans can get 2 million people to turn out on the streets. The people themselves decide to do that," Craner said.

White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan said, "There's accountability in place. We make sure that money is being used for the purposes for which it's assigned or designated."

Since the Ukrainian Supreme Court invalidated the results of the Nov. 21 presidential runoff, Russia and the United States have traded charges of interference. A new election is scheduled for Dec. 26.

Opposition leaders, international monitors and Bush's election envoy to Ukraine have said major fraud marred the runoff between Yushchenko and current Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych, who was declared the winner.

Yushchenko is friendlier toward Europe and the United States than his opponent, who has Putin's support as well as backing from the current Ukrainian government of President Leonid Kuchma. Putin lauded Yanukovych during state visits to Ukraine within a week of both the Oct. 31 election and the Nov. 21 runoff.

Yushchenko's backers say Russian support for Yanukovych goes beyond Putin's praise and includes millions of dollars in campaign funding and other assistance. Putin has said Russia has acted "absolutely correctly" with regard to Ukraine.

Documents and interviews provide a glimpse into how U.S. money was spent inside Ukraine.

"Our money doesn't go to candidates; it goes to the process, the institutions that it takes to run a free and fair election," State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said.

The exit poll, funded by the embassies of the United States and seven other nations as well as four international foundations, said Yushchenko won the Nov. 21 vote by 54 percent to 43 percent. Yanukovych and his supporters say the exit poll was skewed.

The Ukrainian groups that did the poll of more than 28,000 voters have not said how much the project cost. Neither has the U.S.

The four foundations involved included three funded by the U.S. government: The National Endowment for Democracy, which gets its money directly from Congress; the Eurasia Foundation, which gets money from the State Department, and the Renaissance Foundation, part of a network of charities funded by billionaire George Soros that gets money from the State Department. Other countries involved included Great Britain, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Canada, Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

Grants from groups funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development also went to the International Center for Policy Studies, a think tank that includes Yushchenko on its supervisory board. The board also includes several current or former advisers to Kuchma, however.

IRI, Craner's Republican-backed group, used U.S. money to help Yushchenko arrange meetings with Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites), Assistant Secretary of State Richard Armitage and GOP leaders in Congress in February 2003.

The State Department gave the National Democratic Institute, a group of Democratic foreign policy experts, nearly $48 million for worldwide democracy-building programs in 2003. Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright chairs NDI's board of directors.

The NDI says representatives of parties in all the blocs that participated in Ukraine's 2002 parliamentary elections have attended its seminars to learn skills such as writing party platforms, organizing bases of voter support and developing party structures. NDI also has been a main financial and administrative backer of the Committee of Voters of Ukraine, an election watchdog group that said the presidential vote was not conducted fairly.

NDI also organized a 35-member team of election observers headed by former federal appeals court Judge Abner Mikva for the Nov. 21 runoff vote. IRI sent its own team of observers.

The U.S. Agency for International Development also funds the Center for Ukrainian Reform Education, which produces radio and television programs aiming to educate Ukrainian citizens about reforming their nation's government and economy. The center also sponsors press clubs and education for journalists.



 
  Today's Top News     Top World News
 

China concerns Japan's overhaul of defense policy

 

   
 

Loosen gov't control of economy

 

   
 

SAFE: Country not reducing US dollar holdings

 

   
 

China fills top sports post for Olympics

 

   
 

Coal mine blast kills 33 in Shanxi

 

   
 

Watchdog: CAO made 'wrong' decisions

 

   
  Court clears Berlusconi of corruption
   
  US soldier found guilty of murdering Iraqi
   
  GI admits to killing hurt Iraqi teenager
   
  Japan defense plan shifts pacifist stance
   
  Bike bomb kills at least 10 in Pakistan
   
  Sharon invites Labor Party into coalition
   
 
  Go to Another Section  
 
 
  Story Tools  
   
  Related Stories  
   
Ukraine military denies downing Russian airliner
   
Putin: No objection to Ukraine in EU
   
Ukraine government back to work as crisis eases
   
NATO, Russia deny 'Cold War' rift on Ukraine
   
Ukraine's parliament OKs electoral reforms
   
Ukraine president, assembly deadlocked over poll
   
Ukraine leader agrees on measures for fair vote
  News Talk  
  Are the Republicans exploiting the memory of 9/11?  
Advertisement
         
主站蜘蛛池模板: 乱理最新乱理片中文 | 午夜三级黄色片 | 网站一级片 | 高清欧美不卡一区二区三区 | 久久精品国产精品国产精品污 | 国产黄色片免费看 | 国产精品7m凸凹视频分类大全 | 一级女性全黄生活片看看 | 91视在线国内在线播放酒店 | japanese日本护士xx亚洲 | 国产亚洲欧美在线观看的 | 婷婷激情久久 | 久香草视频在线观看免费 | 目韩一区二区三区系列片丶 | 欧美一区二区三区免费 | 性欧美一级毛片欧美片 | 91视频大全| 国产成人精品magnet | 国产成人+亚洲欧洲 | 麻豆国产入口在线观看免费 | 午夜看黄 | 亚洲一区二区三区四区热压胶 | 好吊色青青青国产在线观看 | 精品久久国产老人久久综合 | 久久青青草原精品影院 | 亚洲爱爱网站 | 日韩经典欧美精品一区 | 成人免费淫片在线费观看 | 午夜国产精品久久久久 | 91久久国产精品视频 | 看草逼| 亚洲天天在线日亚洲洲精 | 欧美日韩视频二区三区 | 日本a毛片在线播放 | 亚洲成人综合视频 | 精品国产免费久久久久久 | 日本黄大片视频在线播放 | 欧美国产亚洲一区二区三区 | 中文字幕欧美日韩 | 成人午夜在线播放 | 国产精品午夜性视频网站 |